News
Biden accepts Democratic nomination, vowing to unite country
Ex-Postal Service official: White House involved in slowing mail
Takeaways from the Democratic National Convention
California wildfires kill at least 5, force thousands to evacuate
Republican national security officials back Biden
Doctor claims "no poisons" found in Russian opposition leader
DOJ to again seek death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber
36 Purdue University students suspended after off-campus party
Papua New Guinea bars Chinese mine workers given trial COVID vaccine
2020 Elections
Battleground Tracker: Latest polls, state of the race and more
5 things to know about CBS News' 2020 Battleground Tracker
2020 DNC Night 2: Live updates
Michelle Obama closes out DNC first night with emotional speech
With more mail-in ballots, officials urge patience on election night
Americans and the right to vote: Why it's not easy for everyone
Democrats are happy with Biden's VP pick: CBS News poll
Why some mail-in ballots are rejected and how to make sure your vote counts
What happens if the president doesn't accept the election results?
Election Day could turn into "Election Week" with rise in mail ballots
Shows
CBS This Morning
CBS Evening News
60 Minutes
CBS This Morning: Saturday
Face The Nation
Sunday Morning
48 Hours
CBSN Originals
NCIS: The Cases They Can't Forget
Live
LIVE
More
Search
Search:Live
Watch CBSN Live
President Donald Trump is asking the Supreme Court to allow him to block critics from his personal Twitter account. The administration said in a high-court filing Thursday that Trump's @realdonaldtrump account, with more than 85 million followers, is his personal property, and argued that blocking people from it is akin to elected officials who refuse to allow their opponents' yard signs on their front lawns. "President Trump's ability to use the features of his personal Twitter account, including the blocking function, are independent of his presidential office," acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall wrote, urging the justices to review the case. The federal appeals court in New York ruled last year that Mr. Trump uses the account to make daily pronouncements and observations that are overwhelmingly official in nature. It held that Mr. Trump violated the First Amendment whenever he blocked a critic to silence a viewpoint. A decision about whether even to hear the case is not likely before the November election. The case grew out of a challenge brought by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which sued on behalf of seven individuals blocked by Mr. Trump after criticizing his policies. Jameel Jaffer, the Knight Institute's executive director, said the justices should decline to take up Mr. Trump's appeal. "This case stands for a principle that is fundamental to our democracy and basically synonymous with the First Amendment: government officials can't exclude people from public forums simply because they disagree with their political views," Jaffer said in a statement. The administration argued in its appeal that the Supreme Court, not lower courts, "should decide where to draw the line between the President's personal decisions and official conduct." The pace of the case was slowed by the coronavirus pandemic, as well as by Mr. Trump's decision to ask the full 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to review the ruling by a three-judge panel. The court refused to do so by a 7-2 vote in March. Two Trump appointees, Judges Michael H. Park and Richard J. Sullivan, were the only members of the court to side with the president. The Supreme Court extended its deadline to file an appeal from 90 days to 150 days when it shut the building to the public and abandoned in-person meetings because of the virus outbreak.
Be in the know. Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
View CBS News In
CBS News App
Open
Safari
Continue