The Duchess of Cambridge's sister Pippa Middleton and her husband James Matthews welcomed their third child, a daughter, in June and are now a family of five
Video Loading
Click to play
Tap to play
The video will auto-play soon8Cancel
Queen's Jubilee: Pippa Middleton stuns at Party at the Palace
Pippa Middleton has made a subtle yet sweet nod to the Royal family when choosing the name of her newborn daughter.
Pippa, 38, gave birth to her third child last month and it's believed that she and her husband James Matthews have settled on a name.
The happy couple have reportedly named their new bundle of joy Rose.
According to the Daily Mail, source claimed: "Rose has been the name of some royals across the centuries, including Mary Tudor, known as ‘Mary Rose’, Queen of France."
The name is of Latin origin and refers to the flower, which Roses also being June’s birth month flower.
Pippa Middleton and James Matthews have reportedly called their third child Rose
Image:
( Getty Images Europe)
James and Pippa on their wedding day in May 2017
Image:
( WireImage)
It's unsure if Pippa and James chose the royally popular name for specific reasons, but is also has a nice link to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's daughter Lilibet.
Harry and Meghan chose her moniker after the Queen’s childhood family nickname but call her Lili for short, a variation of the English flower name Lily.
Pippa and James, who married in May 2017, are also parents to son Arthur, three, and one-year-old daughter Grace.
Pippa Middleton during the Platinum Party at the Palace in June
Image:
( Getty Images)
Pippa gave birth to her third child in June
Image:
( Getty Images)
The arrival of their third child comes after it was reported that Pippa and Matthew have purchased a multi million pound home in Pippa’s childhood village.
It's thought the family are planning to leave London and have instead bought a new home just 20 minutes from her parents’ home in the Berkshire village of Bucklebury.
The pair have opted for a £15 million Georgian mansion that has 30 rooms and approximately 150 acres of land.
The extravagant house wasn't thought to have been on the general market and the sale was instead carried out privately.
Read More
Read More
Most Read
Don't Miss
MORE ONGet our daily royal round-up direct to your inbox
Invalid Email
Something went wrong, please try again later.
Thank you for subscribing
We have more newsletters
Show mePrivacy Notice
See our Privacy Notice